40.0k views
0 votes
Why did the great crash produce a ripple effect throughout the nation's economy?

User Jose Palma
by
6.3k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Final answer:

The Great Crash of 1929 caused widespread financial panic, which led to a substantial economic downturn due to factors like poor Federal Reserve policies, banking practices, and disturbed public confidence. The psychology of the public transformed from confidence to fear, inciting massive market sell-offs, bank runs, and a dramatic reduction in consumer spending. The crash proved to be more than a simple market event—it signified the deep-seated weaknesses of the economic system of the time.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Great Crash of 1929 produced a profound ripple effect throughout the nation's economy due to several interconnecting factors. The general public's confidence in everlasting prosperity drove market growth, but once panic set in, a contagion effect ensued. Massive sell-offs plummeted the market value, and Americans, with limited cash reserves, faced psychological and financial distress. The crash revealed significant weaknesses in the economy and the nation's banking system, such as the questionable policies of the Federal Reserve, misguided banking practices, international economic troubles, poor income distribution, and a shaken public confidence.

Banks lost millions, resulting in foreclosures and loan recalls that further pressured consumers. The crash's impact was aggravated by a lack of government intervention and social safety nets, leading to widespread poverty, unemployment, and reduced consumer spending. Industry sectors like automobiles and construction suffered deep falls in demand, contributing to the economic downturn. The unequal wealth distribution meant that when the crash hit, consumer spending—a key component of the economy—stalled, and the financial markets continued spiraling downward.

The situation worsened with the Great Recession of 2008, which shared similarities with the 1929 financial collapse. Consumer spending declined due to a lack of credit, international trade slowed, and businesses were hurt globally. The government's bailouts appeared to prioritize the wealthy, exacerbating public resentment and economic disparity.

User Brian Baker
by
6.9k points
5 votes
Stocks directly affected only 4 million out of 120 million people. Indirectly:
-Risky loans hurt banks
-Consumer borrowing
-Bank runs
-Bank failures
-Savings wiped out (Banks failures wiped out peoples saving)
-Cuts in production
-Rise in unemployment
-Further cuts in production
User Lowell
by
6.5k points