200k views
2 votes
A square has the coordinates (−2, 2), (−4, 2), (−4, 4), and (−2, 4) at its vertices. The transformed square has the coordinates (−6, 6), (−12, 6), (−12, 12), and (−6, 12) at its vertices. Are the square and its transformation congruent? Why or why not? A. Yes, the transformation is a dilation of the square with a scale factor of . B. Yes, the transformation is a dilation of the square with a scale factor of 3. C. No, the transformation is a dilation of the square with a scale factor of 3. D. No, the transformation is a dilation of the square with a scale factor of .

2 Answers

2 votes
The answer is C. No, the transformation is a dilation of the square with a scale factor of 3..
User Cleversprocket
by
7.3k points
4 votes
the answer is C.
every number for the coordinates of the original square multiplying by 3 get the corresponding coordinates for the new square.
a dilated polygon is similar to the original one, not congruent.
User Mring
by
7.8k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories