Question

List the arguments of the war hawks from the south and west for going to war with britain in 1812 and the objections advanced by federalist new york and new england

Answer 1

The war hawks from the South and West were motivated by a desire to protect American honor and assert independence, while Federalists in New York and New England objected to the war due to its potential economic harm to their region.

Step-by-step explanation:

The arguments of the war hawks from the South and West for going to war with Britain in 1812 were mainly centered around protecting American honor and asserting American independence. The war hawks, led by Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun, believed that British insults and the seizure of American ships and sailors needed to be addressed through military action. They saw the war as an opportunity to assert American sovereignty and expand westward.

On the other hand, Federalists in New York and New England had objections to the war. These objections were primarily based on the economic harm that they believed the war would inflict on their region. The Northeast was heavily dependent on maritime commerce, and war would disrupt their trade. Additionally, Federalists from New England felt that the war was being pushed by slaveholding Virginians, such as Jefferson and Madison, who they perceived as indifferent to their region's concerns.

Answer 2

The War Hawks were eager to end the taking of American sailors by the British and opening new territories through military conquest, such as invading Canada. The Federalists were mainly supporters of the England and did not want to go to war as it would unsettle their trading with the British.