Final answer:
The Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren was considered activist, meaning it made decisions that broadened individual rights and liberties. The Warren Court's impact on our lives today can be seen as positive, as it contributed to the protection and advancement of civil rights and civil liberties.
Step-by-step explanation:
Judicial activism refers to a judicial philosophy in which the Supreme Court is more likely to overturn decisions or rule actions by the other branches unconstitutional, especially in an attempt to broaden individual rights and liberties. During Chief Justice Earl Warren's tenure, the Supreme Court under his leadership was considered activist because it made decisions that expanded civil rights and civil liberties, as well as the role and power of the judiciary. The court banned prayer in public schools, declared loyalty oaths unconstitutional, limited censorship power, expanded the meanings of symbolic speech, and extended rights of those accused of crimes. These decisions had a significant impact on our lives today, contributing to the protection and advancement of individual rights and liberties. The Warren Court's impact can be seen as positive by those who support the expansion of civil rights and civil liberties.