18.5k views
1 vote
Hi I need some help with this history-based question :)

Yale University professor William Graham Sumner was an advocate for social Darwinism. Sumner said, “There is an old ecclesiastical prejudice in favor of the poor and against the rich.” As a social Darwinist, he objected to this prejudice as he saw it. Advocates of the movement known as the Social Gospel, on the other hand, would have approved of the “ecclesiastical prejudice.” In an essay, explain the difference between the social Darwinism and the Social Gospel movement. Describe some of the actions that the advocates of each philosophy practiced or wanted to see put into practice.

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

social darwinism is a theory that supports the rich getting richer. Republican party is based around this theory. Since they believe that those who are the fittest get the money, there is no reason to help the poor, because that is their fault. We can also attach to this the theory of mercantilism where everyone get what they truly deserve. On the other hand, social gospel movement is a christian movement that wanted to help the poor based on christian values. This movement applied christian ethics to social problems such as poverty, delinquency, racism, child labor and so on.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Agoncharov
by
7.1k points
1 vote

Answer:

Darwin argued that species develop and evolve over time, as those who have one or another advantage triumph in the struggle for survival. This idea was adopted by public thinkers. Some of them, calling themselves social Darwinists, began to argue that various groups of people - nations, classes and races - like animal species, also fight among themselves for survival. Social Darwinists argued that the weak should not survive, that public policy and private morality should protect the strong, that human populations should be formed in accordance with the ideals of the dominant groups.

Scientists in this area upheld the principle of personal responsibility for the material well-being of each particular family, talked about the inevitability of social inequality. The denial of the possibility of social equality made poverty legal.

On the contrary, the Social Gospel movement was a response to the problems that have arisen in American society due to the rapid growth of industrialization, urbanization and an increase in the influx of emigrants during the “gilded age.” The economic crisis has led to a wide gap between the living standards of a small, wealthy stratum and the vast majority of American workers. Against the background of these processes, the movement of the Social Gospel arose and developed in American society, which demanded the achievement of social justice: it called for the struggle against economic inequality and poverty. In the future, many ideals of the movement were embodied in the laws of the New Deal - the economic policy of President Roosevelt

The striving for social justice in frames of the Social Gospel movement was grounded in the biblical principles of mercy and justice. Proponents of the Social Gospel supported the labor movement and called for government intervention in a market economy to achieve general welfare.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Musannif Zahir
by
6.8k points