Question

How did the Indian removal act of 1830 go against the Worcester v. Georgia ruling?


A. It extended a military campaign against Native American peoples who had farm land.

B. It nullified all previous treaties that protected the interests of Georgians against Cherokees.

C. It was a law banning NA groups from owning land within the borders of any US state.

D. It ignored the fact that Indian lands were sovereign and not technically part of the US.

Answer 1

The Indian Removal Act of 1830 went against the Worcester v. Georgia ruling because it ignored the fact that Indian lands were sovereign and not technically part of the US.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Indian Removal Act of 1830 went against the Worcester v. Georgia ruling in that it ignored the fact that Indian lands were sovereign and not technically part of the US. In Worcester v. Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled that only the national government, not the states, had authority in Indian affairs. The Indian Removal Act, however, allowed for the forced relocation of Native American tribes from their ancestral lands, disregarding their sovereignty.

Answer 2

my best guess is b :) hope i helped