Question

How does a scientist critique another scientist’s conclusion?

A. By making fun of the other scientist
B. By reading secondary source
C. By making up alternate conclusion
D. By presenting date that contradicts those conclusions

Answer 1

B just joking D? I think I have to make up my sentence to 20 letters that is why i am talking haha x

Answer 2

The correct answer is D. By presenting data that contradicts those conclusions

Step-by-step explanation:

Criticizing in science must be supported by data which validates the alternative conclusion. If a scientist want to demonstrate that another scientist is wrong about a conclusion- o that there are some aspects to improve- he or she has to present valid data and elaborate a new conclusion. It is like presenting evidence in a case.