101k views
4 votes
When looking at a rational fraction f(x) = (x-6)(x+3(x+4) over (x+6) (x-3) (x-4), Jamal and Angie have two different thoughts. Jamal says that the function is defined at x = p-6, x = 3, and x = 4. Angie says that the function is undefined at those x values. Who is correct? Justify your reasoning.

1 Answer

6 votes
We say a function is undefined when the value gotten isn't present in the domain of the function, like division by a 0 denominator or 0 to the power of 0. That said, we would like to find out whether at each point in the domain, the two points x = 3 and x = 4 exist i.e we don't end up with the indeterminate form. Okay at x =3, we have f(3) = (3-6) (3+3) (3+4)/(3+6) (3-3) (3-4) = (-3) (6) (7) / 0 which is undefined. We don't have to show for x =4 since "4" is negative in the denominator. We would also end up with an undefined function. So, yes, Angie is right.
User Samiq
by
8.3k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories