Final answer:
The Great Schism of 1054 was not caused by any King Philip but rather was the result of long-standing differences between the Eastern and Western churches. Conflicts involving King Philip IV of France and King Philip II of Spain were related to other historical events that affected the church's authority and the Protestant-Catholic relations, not to the Great Schism of 1054.
Step-by-step explanation:
The query regarding how King Philip caused the Great Schism seems to be based on a misunderstanding. The Great Schism of 1054, which led to the division between the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church, was not caused by any King Philip. Instead, it was a result of increasing theological, political, and cultural differences between the eastern and western parts of Christendom, culminating in mutual excommunications by the pope and the patriarch of Constantinople. The schisms involving characters named Philip, such as the conflict between Pope Boniface VIII and King Philip IV of France, or the launch of the Spanish Armada by Philip II of Spain, occurred in different contexts and do not refer to the ecclesiastical split known as the Great Schism.
King Philip IV's conflict with the papacy notably weakened papal authority and led to the Avignon papacy, but this was separate from the Great Schism of 1054. Similarly, Philip II of Spain's actions were part of the broader Protestant-Catholic conflicts of the 16th century. However, neither of these Kings was involved in the initial split between the Eastern and Western Christian churches.