219k views
4 votes
Fores construction company reported a pretax operating loss of $135 million for financial reporting purposes in 2013. contributing to the loss were (a) a penalty of $5 million assessed by the environmental protection agency for violation of a federal law and paid in 2013 and (b) an estimated loss of $10 million from accruing a loss contingency. the loss will be tax deductible when paid in 2014.

2 Answers

6 votes

Final answer:

Compliance with environmental laws costs U.S firms over $200 billion annually, which contributes to reducing pollution through incentives like the pollution tax. While the costs are significant, the long-term benefits of cleaner air and water can justify these expenses.

Step-by-step explanation:

When considering whether the $200 billion that U.S. firms may pay to comply with federal environmental laws is well spent, it is important to weigh the benefits and costs of such regulations. These laws aim to protect the environment by reducing pollution, thereby promoting public health and potentially avoiding the long-term costs associated with environmental degradation. An example of the economics behind these laws can be illustrated by a pollution tax.

If a firm faces a pollution tax, it must choose between paying the tax or reducing pollution by investing in abatement strategies. For instance, if abating 10 pounds of particulates costs the firm $300, which is much less than a $1,000 pollution tax, the firm will have the incentive to reduce its pollution levels, leading to cleaner air and water. Therefore, although compliance costs are significant, they often encourage firms to invest in more sustainable practices that can benefit both the environment and society in the long run.

User Dennison
by
8.3k points
1 vote
$4,3 million   ..............
User Edgarian
by
7.8k points