Question

APEX

A group of high school students decide to wear T-shirts supporting a controversial political candidate. A few people talk about the shirts, but most students ignore them. Based on the Supreme Court's ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines School District, would the students be allowed to wear the shirts?
A) Yes, Because political speech is always protected.
B) No, because the T-shirts do not fairly represent both sides of the issue.
C) No, because public schools are prohibited from endorsing political candidates.
D) Yes, because the T-shirts do not disrupt school activities.

Answer 1

The Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines School District supports the right of students to express their political opinions unless it affects school activities. The students can wear the shirts as it doesn't cause any disruption.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the context of American law and the student's question, the correct answer would be D) Yes, because the T-shirts do not disrupt school activities. The precedent set in the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines School District upholds the right of students to express their opinions, as long as the expression does not interfere with the conduct of classwork or school activities. In this case, since most students are ignoring the group with the controversial political shirts, it indicates that the shirts are not disrupting school activities.

Learn more about Tinker v. Des Moines School District

Answer 2

The correct answer is D. Based on the Supreme Court's ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines School District, the students would be allowed to wear T-shirts supporting a political candidate, as the T-shirts do not disrupt school activities.

Step-by-step explanation:

The ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines stated that the combination of the First and Fourteen Amendments to the Constitution of the United States did not allow a public school to punish its students for the use of political symbols, since this was a type of indirect discourse protected by the First Amendment that did not obstruct the normal functioning of the school activity.

Applying the same precedent, the students must be authorized to wear the T-shirts, as they would not be affecting the normal school activity.