225k views
5 votes
Two lawyers are arguing against each other in court. the first, ms. smith, tries to persuade the jury with logical, relevant arguments. the second, mr. henderson, tries to persuade the jury by looking attractive and wearing an expensive suit. ms. smith is trying to use the __________ route to persuasion, while mr. henderson is trying to use the __________ route.

2 Answers

5 votes

Final answer:

Ms. Smith is using the central route to persuasion while Mr. Henderson is using the peripheral route.

Step-by-step explanation:

The first lawyer, Ms. Smith, is using the central route to persuasion by presenting logical and relevant arguments to persuade the jury. The central route relies on using data and facts to convince people of an argument's worthiness. On the other hand, Mr. Henderson is using the peripheral route to persuasion by trying to persuade the jury through superficial factors such as his appearance and expensive suit. This route focuses on non-logical factors to influence people's attitudes and behaviors.

5 votes
Ms Smith is trying to trying to use the central route to persuasion, while Mr Henderson is trying to use the peripheral route to persuasion. Both routes are the two different ways to persuasion.
User Irshu
by
7.7k points