Register

Do you think primary sources or secondary sources are more valuable to modern historians? Why?

Do you think primary sources or secondary sources are more valuable to modern historians? Why?
209k views
5 votes
Do you think primary sources or secondary sources are more valuable to modern historians? Why?

User Terrance Jackson
by
8.4k points

2 Answers

7 votes
Primary sources because it could have changed over the years

User Jshbrntt
by
9.2k points
4 votes
Primary Sources because it’s a part of our life time and it part of our history and it’s how we developed in the first place. Glad I can try to help you
User Tasontag
by
8.8k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

No related questions found

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories

Other Questions

What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
Link Copied!