100k views
0 votes
The rule (x,y)→(2x,2y) maps △DEF to △D′E′F′.

Which statement correctly describes the relationship between △DEF and △D′E′F′ ?

The triangles are not congruent because △D′E′F′ is a translation of △DEF , and a translation is not a rigid motion.
The triangles are congruent because △D′E′F′ is a rotation of △DEF , and a rotation is a rigid motion.
The triangles are not congruent because △D′E′F′ is a dilation of △DEF , and a dilation is not a rigid motion.
The triangles are congruent because △D′E′F′ is a reflection of △DEF , and a reflection is a rigid motion.

User Azfar Niaz
by
7.4k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer: The triangles are not congruent because △D′E′F′ is a dilation of △DEF .

Explanation:

Rigid motions form congruent figures, the common rigid motions are:

1) translation (moves figure about some distance)

2) reflection (creates mirror image)

3) rotation (rotate figure about some degrees)

Dilation : It does not create congruent images. It creates an image that is the exactly same shape as the original, but have a different size with the help of a scale factor k .

Given : The rule (x,y)→(2x,2y) maps △DEF to △D′E′F′.

Here the coordinates of the image are increased by using a scale factor 2.

So △D′E′F′ must be an enlargement of △DEF.

⇒△D′E′F′ is a dilation of △DEF

It means : The triangles are not congruent because △D′E′F′ is a dilation of △DEF , and a dilation is not a rigid motion.

User Yoonjung
by
7.7k points
4 votes

Answer:

The triangles are not congruent because △D′E′F′ is a dilation of △DEF , and a dilation is not a rigid motion.

Explanation:

The rule we have is (x, y)→(2x, 2y). This means that each x-coordinate and each y-coordinate are multiplied by 2. This is a dilation by a factor of 2.

This will stretch the image by a factor of 2; this means the sides will be twice as long. This means they will not be congruent.

User BanditKing
by
8.6k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.