Final answer:
While a 4% increase in nominal GDP suggests economic growth, two additional pieces of information, inflation and population growth, are vital to assess the impact on the standard of living. Real GDP growth, adjusted for inflation and per capita figures considering population growth, provides a clearer picture. Beyond quantitative measures, qualitative improvements in health, education, environment, and technology also contribute to the standard of living.
Step-by-step explanation:
When analyzing the implications of a 4% increase in nominal GDP in 2004 for the standard of living, it is essential to consider two additional pieces of information: the rate of inflation and population growth. Nominal GDP does not account for inflation, which means that if the price level increased by, for instance, 2%, the real growth in economic output would only be 2% rather than the nominal 4%. Additionally, if the population grew by 2%, the per capita GDP growth might be negligible, indicating that the standard of living has not improved significantly.
Furthermore, GDP growth alone does not fully embody the overall standard of living. Factors like improved health, increased education, cleaner environment, and technological advancements, which significantly improve the quality of life, are not captured by the GDP measure. As such, these qualitative aspects may lead to a rise in the actual standard of living that surpasses the GDP increase, offering a more comprehensive view of economic welfare.