Question

Essay that compare and contrast the language use in Andrew Jackson's Address to congress and Samuel's memory by Michael Rutledge

Answer 1

Jackson's address to Congress and the essay "Samuel's Memory" by Michael Rutledge examine a similar subject, and this is the uprooting of American Indians from their native land. However, the two passages investigate this case from very different points of view, specifically with regards to the utilization of language and diction.

In regards to Jackson’s speech, the language is very formal and businesslike, which mirrors the political nature of the content. Additionally, Jackson utilizes positive language to show that the forced removal of Native Americans is a positive activity for the United States to take, as it will open up more land to whites. In contrast, the passage "Samuel's Memory" utilizes language that is less formal, which illustrates that Samuel is just a boy, and that the content is a personal story of an individual affected by this event. Also, the text reveals a substantially more raw, honest, gruesome, and negative perspective on this event.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

Andrew Jackson's Message to Congress on 'Indian Removal' is clarifying his fervor and consolation in the way that the expulsion of Indian tribes from the United States was originating from a 'glad culmination.' He discusses how this is extremely advantageous to the prosperity of Americans and their nation. He talks externally; be that as it may, 'Samuel's Memory' demonstrates an altogether different point of view to this evacuation. Both stories are displaying a similar occasion, nonetheless, the dialect utilized makes an altogether different feel to it.