136k views
4 votes
Jim makes the following conjecture: other than 1, there are no numbers less than 100 that are perfect squares and perfect cubes. what is a counterexample that proves his conjecture false?

User Kishh
by
8.7k points

1 Answer

2 votes
The number 64 is a counterexample to Jim's conjecture because it is the square of 8 and the cube of 4. A fast way to solve this problem is to list out the perfect cubes that are less than 100 and check if any of them are also perfect squares. A perfect square is a number which can be written as another number multiplied by itself, and a perfect cube is one which can be written as a number multiplied by itself twice. The perfect cubes less than 100 are as follows: 1*1*1 = 1 2*2*2 = 8 3*3*3 = 27 4*4*4 = 64 Now we can calculate perfect squares until we find one in this list 1*1 = 1 2*2 = 4 3*3 = 9 4*4 = 16 5*5 = 25 6*6 = 36 7*7 = 49 8*8 = 64 We see that 64 is in the list of perfect squares and perfect cubes, so this is a counterexample to Jim's conjecture.
User Akhilesh Sharma
by
8.3k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories