menu
QAmmunity.org
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
Register
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question
Why would historians prefer primary sources over secondary sources?
asked
Dec 13, 2018
172k
views
5
votes
Why would historians prefer primary sources over secondary sources?
History
middle-school
Chars Davy
asked
by
Chars Davy
6.0k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
6
votes
Primary sources told an account of what actually happened because they were recorded from the actual event itself/saw the actual event
secondary sources (like our textbooks) arent 100% accurate because they are based off of the primary sources
Shey
answered
Dec 17, 2018
by
Shey
6.2k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.
7.2m
questions
9.6m
answers
Other Questions
What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
Modern Western ideas about freedom, the value of the individual, forms of government, and systems of law came from __________.
Why did foreign powers treat the US government under the Articles of Confederation with scorn?
What was the major events that led the British to defeat
Why did the Berlin Conference occur?
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search QAmmunity.org