Register

Samantha says that (64)–3 = 6. Is she correct? Why or why not?

Samantha says that (64)–3 = 6. Is she correct? Why or why not?
108k views
2 votes
Samantha says that (64)–3 = 6. Is she correct? Why or why not?

User DaWe
by
7.6k points

2 Answers

3 votes
She is wrong because 3 subtracted from 64 isn’t 6 it is 61.
User Sumit Shukla
by
8.3k points
3 votes
No, she is not correct. If you subtract 3 from 64, you will get 61.
User Patrine
by
7.7k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

No related questions found

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories

Other Questions

How do you can you solve this problem 37 + y = 87; y =
What is .725 as a fraction
i have a field 60m long and 110 wide going to be paved i ordered 660000000cm cubed of cement  how thick must the cement be to cover field
Link Copied!