81.7k views
3 votes
A historian is interested in determining whether a new biography of Franklin D. Roosevelt, the president of the united states from 1933 to 1945, is biased against its subject . Which of the following pieces of evidence would be most helpful to her?

A) A photograph of Roosevelt angrily yelling at a member of his staff
B) A speech given by Roosevelt's electoral opponent criticizing his economic policies
C) A letter from the book's writer discussing how much he hates Roosevelt
D) a secondary source that describes Roosevelt as an overly aggressive leader

User Manix
by
8.3k points

2 Answers

4 votes
D,because it is saying biased against.
hope it helped
User Juanito
by
9.0k points
3 votes

Answer:

C) A letter from the book's writer discussing how much he hates Roosevelt.

Step-by-step explanation:

If the author openly admits in a letter that he hates Roosevelt, this is a very condemning evidence of bias. The photograph and the speech that are included in the book are not necessarily biased because they simply reflect a fact, and because we do not know the specific purpose they serve in the book. Option D is also wrong because the description of Roosevelt in a secondary source has no relevance to the way it is portrayed in this book.

User Philomena
by
8.9k points