81.7k views
3 votes
A historian is interested in determining whether a new biography of Franklin D. Roosevelt, the president of the united states from 1933 to 1945, is biased against its subject . Which of the following pieces of evidence would be most helpful to her?

A) A photograph of Roosevelt angrily yelling at a member of his staff
B) A speech given by Roosevelt's electoral opponent criticizing his economic policies
C) A letter from the book's writer discussing how much he hates Roosevelt
D) a secondary source that describes Roosevelt as an overly aggressive leader

User Manix
by
8.3k points

2 Answers

4 votes
D,because it is saying biased against.
hope it helped
User Juanito
by
9.0k points
3 votes

Answer:

C) A letter from the book's writer discussing how much he hates Roosevelt.

Step-by-step explanation:

If the author openly admits in a letter that he hates Roosevelt, this is a very condemning evidence of bias. The photograph and the speech that are included in the book are not necessarily biased because they simply reflect a fact, and because we do not know the specific purpose they serve in the book. Option D is also wrong because the description of Roosevelt in a secondary source has no relevance to the way it is portrayed in this book.

User Philomena
by
8.9k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.