Question

Argumentative Writing

For this task, you will write a letter on one of the topics related to freedom of expression and the limits on freedom of speech. Choose one of the topics listed below. Think about which aspect of the topic you will write about.
• Freedom of speech: You might write about whether schools should have the right to limit what is discussed or covered in a student newspaper or a student news broadcast. (There is a Supreme Court ruling stating that school officials cannot censor student expression unless there is reasonable proof that such expression can disrupt school activities.)
• Freedom of the press: You might write about conflicts that arise when journalists try to photograph or videotape police in action. You might also consider whether cameras should be allowed in a courtroom.
• Banned books: Certain books are banned in schools. You might want to write about whether or not this is a good policy.
• Speech related to violence: You might want to write about limitations on freedom of speech related to violence. Speech that incites violence is not covered by the First Amendment and can result in prosecution in the United States. However, speech that merely supports violence as a political option is not considered a crime.



Part A
Before you begin your letter, decide to whom you will address it. The addressee should be someone whose opinion is important to you.(You might choose to write to a member of congress, your school principal, or a teacher.)
To whom are you writing your letter? What prompted your choice of topic and audience?

Part b

Now write your letter explaining your stance on the issue you chose. Your writing should reflect a strong opinion on the topic. Your arguments in favor of your stance should be supported by evidence.
Insert your letter in the space provided

Answer 1

part A: As this point is something all the more a public issue as opposed to one inside one single school, I would address the letter to an individual from congress. Addressing it to any other person would do close to nothing to resolve the issue in fact.

part B: While the right to speak freely of discourse permits one to offer their viewpoints openly, the people who participate in discourse advancing viciousness, or disdain discourse, adversely influence society all in all as well as on a singular level. Thusly, discourse advancing viciousness ought not be viewed as under the Primary Correction, and those people who decide to take part in it ought to be oppressed.

Step-by-step explanation:

I mixed the words above so it doesn't get plagiarized

Answer 2

Personally, I would choose this topic:
Speech related to violence: You might want to write about limitations on freedom of speech related to violence. Speech that incites violence is not covered by the First Amendment and can result in prosecution in the United States. However, speech that merely supports violence as a political option is not considered a crime.

Part A: As this topic is something that is more of a national issue than one within one single school, I would address the letter to a member of congress. Addressing it to anyone else would do little to actually address the issue.

Part B:

Stance: While freedom of speech allows one to express their opinions publicly, those who engage in speech promoting violence, or hate speech, negatively impact society as a whole as well as on an individual level. As such, speech promoting violence should not be considered under the First Amendment, and those individuals who choose to engage in it should be persecuted.

Evidence: Recent KKK & Antifa conflict in Charlottesville,