82.3k views
4 votes
Loyalty to one's husband or wife is highly valued in many societies. Do you think Monsieur Loisel is a good example or a bad example of this loyalty? Why or why not? Give three examples of Guy de Maupassant's naturalistic style of presenting characters and plot and show why they are naturalistic. You will be graded on the following criteria: Clearly state your position and support it with evidence from "The Necklace." Use specific quotes. Make sure each paragraph contains one main idea and supporting details. Use complete sentences including compound and complex sentences. Include an introductory paragraph, proper transitions, and a conclusion. Make sure your essay contains no errors in conventions such as spelling or grammatical errors, and is at least 150 words long.

User Omikron
by
8.6k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Final answer:

Monsieur Loisel from "The Necklace" is a good example of loyalty, as he helps his wife replace a lost necklace and assumes debt, reflecting the societal pressures of their time. Maupassant's naturalistic style shows characters shaped by their environments, highlighting Loisel's loyalty amidst societal expectations.

Step-by-step explanation:

Monsieur Loisel in Guy de Maupassant's "The Necklace" can indeed be seen as a good example of loyalty to one's spouse. First, when Madame Loisel loses the borrowed necklace, her husband not only agrees to help her replace it but also sacrifices his own future to pay off the debt. This demonstrates profound loyalty and commitment.

Maupassant's naturalistic style is evident through his characters, like Loisel, who are shaped by their environment and socioeconomic status. For example, when Loisel gives up the money he had saved for a hunting gun to buy the replacement necklace, this reflects the environmental pressures of societal expectations and the sacrifices made to uphold them. Similarly, Madame Loisel's dissatisfaction with her modest life and her pursuit of falsehoods also illustrate the deterministic nature of her environment on her life choices.

In conclusion, Monsieur Loisel exemplifies loyalty, as seen in his selfless actions to support his wife despite the tremendous personal costs. In the unforgiving and deterministic world Maupassant paints, Loisel's actions affirm his steadfastness amidst a society where prestige and appearance dictate one's choices. His unwavering support of his wife, despite the illusions and pretentious facades, speaks to a deeper sense of fidelity and honor.

User Evan Friedland
by
8.0k points
3 votes

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

I think that Monsieur Loisel is a great example of Loyalty, Ive never heard of a husband who do suchgreat things for his wife. He showed full support when she needed a dress and even when she needed jewlery, he waisted all his money for her to be happy. On the other hand,letting her lie and repayig the debt for 10 years wasnt loyal because if he was to tell her the truth and what she was getting herself into making her tell the truth that would have done them better. Being Loyal can go both ways.

If Monsieur Loisel would have been straight up and told her to tell the truth because he loves her and wants her to do the right thing, it wouldnt have got into this mess into the first place. Also because she ruined both their lifes and he never left her (because it was all her fault) is very loyal and he never complained.

User Andrey Kartashov
by
7.5k points