232k views
4 votes
what freedoms do you think we don't need in the U.S.? Which ones would you be willing to give up if you thought it would make you safer or more comfortable? explain why.

User Gwyn Evans
by
8.7k points

2 Answers

6 votes

Final answer:

The debate over which freedoms to limit for safety is complex, often centering on the balance between national security and personal liberties, such as those affected by the USA PATRIOT Act. While some freedoms, like religious liberty and freedom of speech, are well-protected in the U.S., government intrusion still raises concerns. Solutions include transparency and oversight to protect liberties while maintaining security.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question about which freedoms might be deemed unnecessary or which ones people would be willing to give up for safety or comfort is highly subjective and can elicit a range of opinions. In the United States, the USA PATRIOT Act and other governmental measures have sparked debate regarding the balance between national security and individual freedoms. It is a longstanding principle that individuals often trade some freedoms for increased security, particularly in the context of preventing acts of terrorism, such as stepped-up screening processes at airports.

When examining which rights and freedoms are well-protected, Americans often note the enforcement of freedom of speech, religious liberty, free elections, and an impartial judicial system. However, concerns about government intrusion into personal liberties persist, especially in the areas of surveillance, data collection, and the potential for religious discrimination. The level of adherence to religious freedom, as one example, can be inconsistent depending on the belief system in question.

To address these issues, some propose increased transparency, stricter oversight of surveillance programs, and a continued commitment to the core values outlined in the U.S. Constitution. As this topic involves constitutional interpretation and the ongoing dialogue about civil liberties, it is essential that any discussion regarding limiting or upholding freedoms be approached with careful consideration.

User Beibei
by
7.4k points
6 votes
No alcohol... because alcohol (not drugs) had caused more injuries than people with diseases
User Base
by
8.2k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.