19.3k views
5 votes
2. Was the cost of the war higher for the North or the South? Be sure to consider the social, political, and economic effects of the war.

• Explain, in a paragraph of your own words, which side paid a higher price for the war.
• Include at least two specific pieces of evidence from the lesson to support your response.
• Include information from at least two sections of the lesson (CHOOSE TWO HERE: Social, Economic, or Political) to support your response.

User Ryskajakub
by
7.3k points

2 Answers

4 votes
In 1859 50% of the nations wealth, stocks, bonds, land, cash was in slaves owned by southerners. They lost everything. The north pay less on the south slavery was not finish and they where trying to go to the north for better jobs and freedom the south had force slaves to work.

Hope this helps :)
User Jpkeisala
by
7.2k points
2 votes

Overall, the cost of the war was significantly higher for the South than for the North, due to several reasons.

First of all, it was the South that relied the most on slavery. As slavery was outlawed, the South had a shortage of labor.

Another reason is the fact that the North had industries that allowed them to be more effective during the war and to continue to be functional afterwards. On the other hand, the South relied on agriculture, which was difficult to conduct while the war was going on.

Moreover, after the war ended, many former slaves migrated to the South in order to try to find better opportunities. This meant that the population in the South decreased, leading to a shortage of workers.

Finally, the South was also deeply affected in terms of their pride and identity, which had important consequences in social and political terms.

User Vander
by
7.9k points