menu
Qammunity.org
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
Actual people cannot be considered valid sources for research
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Ask a Question
Actual people cannot be considered valid sources for research
asked
Jul 6, 2018
24.6k
views
0
votes
Actual people cannot be considered valid sources for research
English
college
Lolyoshi
asked
by
Lolyoshi
8.4k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
2
Answers
2
votes
Not without evidence or being a primary source. Such as a Doctor with a degree, or a WWII veteran.
Fabian Barney
answered
Jul 9, 2018
by
Fabian Barney
8.0k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
5
votes
That is true because ten equals decent ten secknds
KaramJaber
answered
Jul 11, 2018
by
KaramJaber
8.6k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
← Prev Question
Next Question →
No related questions found
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.
9.4m
questions
12.2m
answers
Categories
All categories
Mathematics
(3.7m)
History
(955k)
English
(903k)
Biology
(716k)
Chemistry
(440k)
Physics
(405k)
Social Studies
(564k)
Advanced Placement
(27.5k)
SAT
(19.1k)
Geography
(146k)
Health
(283k)
Arts
(107k)
Business
(468k)
Computers & Tech
(195k)
French
(33.9k)
German
(4.9k)
Spanish
(174k)
Medicine
(125k)
Law
(53.4k)
Engineering
(74.2k)
Other Questions
Passe para a voz passiva: - Kevin asked Dennis a question -Somebody Build the house last year -She gives him a box
Who is the author of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland'??
why is mercury usually hard to see without a telescope?
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search Qammunity.org