Question

NEED HELP QUICK!

Which of the following best explains the relationship between U.S. foreign policy in Latin America and the Pacific in the 1800s and early 1900s?


A. The U.S. displayed more interest in Hawaii and the Philippines in the Pacific than in Cuba and Panama.


B. Based on the Monroe Doctrine, the U.S. used more force in Latin America than in the Pacific.


C. The U.S. avoided war in both the Pacific and Latin America through peaceful treaties.


D. Primarily concerned about Latin America, the U.S. had little interest in the Pacific.

Answer 1

D. Primary concerned. That's the anserr

Answer 2

The correct answer is B. Based on the Monroe Doctrine, the U.S. used more force in Latin America than in the Pacific.

Step-by-step explanation

The Monroe Doctrine was a strategy developed mainly during the 19th and 20th centuries, by the United States to avoid European intervention in the American territories through its intervention, under the slogan of "America for the Americans."

This strategy was used by the United States to easily intervene in the other American countries, mainly Latin American countries after the wars of independence of each country because at this time they needed to establish strong governments to avoid European colonialism. This situation was seen by the United States as an opportunity to offer its economic aid and government support, however, this doctrine has been used to impose the superiority of the United States across the continent. At the same time, the interests of the United States were less interested in Pacific affairs, however, with its national security policy it always kept it in mind. So, the correct answer is B. Based on the Monroe Doctrine, the U.S. used more force in Latin America than in the Pacific.