Register
What did the US Supreme Court decide in this case? Restrictive covenants could be decided on a case-by-case basis. Lawmakers had the right to make racial restrictions in housing legal. The Fourteenth Amendment
127,386 views
39 votes
39 votes
What did the US Supreme Court decide in this case?

Restrictive covenants could be decided on a case-by-case basis.
Lawmakers had the right to make racial restrictions in housing legal.
The Fourteenth Amendment supported the concept of a restrictive covenant.
Racial restrictions in housing were not constitutional and could not be enforced.

User Bravo Yeung
by
2.3k points

2 Answers

22 votes
22 votes

Answer:

prohibited the sale of property to non-Caucasians unconstitutionally violate the equal protection provision

User Ragini
by
3.1k points
23 votes
23 votes

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Racial restrictions in housing were not constitutional and could not be enforced.

User Dnth
by
2.7k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

1.6m questions

2.0m answers

Other Questions

If a country or group of people do something to another country or group of people, does it affect the rest of the world? Did what King Leopold II do in the Congo affect the US? Does what the U.S. do to
Give me 3 important facts about the Jurassic Period. Thank you
What manufacturing industry did World War II MOST help establish in Texas? A) car manufacturing B) textile manufacturing C) airplane manufacturing Eliminate D) computer manufacturing
As a result of their dissatisfaction with the Catholic Church both Martin and Luther and Henry Vllll
Which of these is the most likely reason for the map to be called "The Fertile Crescent"? A. The highlighted land contained Mesopotamia where there were many babies born. B. The highlighted land is located
Link Copied!