100.0k views
0 votes
Which of the following explains the decision in the Sacco and Vanzetti Trial?

The American public's aggressive pushes for a guilty verdict poisoned the jury.
The judge was able to hand down a just verdict despite Red Scare hysteria.
The anti-immigrant sentiments of the time swayed the judge and led to a guilty verdict.
The two men were rightly convicted for their acts of wrongdoing.

User Maru
by
8.0k points

2 Answers

5 votes
The anti-immigrant sentiments of the time swayed the judge and led to a guilty verdict
User SamuelNLP
by
7.4k points
1 vote
The answer is "The anti-immigrant sentiments of the time swayed the judge and led to a guilty verdict". Civil liberty was not given to these two men who were forced to speak out their political opinions. Anti-radical movements had rallied on because they believed that these Italian merchants were innocent and were framed from such accusation.
User Rdanusha
by
7.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.