189k views
2 votes
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?

A. To hear about the event from someone who was directly involved

B. To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event

C. To see the event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it

D. To understand how people felt during the period when the event happened

2 Answers

4 votes

correct answer is B) to learn

User Paul Prewett
by
7.8k points
4 votes
B. To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event
User Prageeth Saravanan
by
7.2k points