Question

How would both Karl Marx and Adam Smith respond to Thomas Malthus's ideas regarding poverty? They would have agreed that poverty was the result of a natural increase in population in relation to food supply. They would have disagreed on the idea that assisting the poor caused them long-term harm. They would have agreed that it was impossible to develop agriculture sufficient to feed any population. They would have disagreed on the idea that war, poverty, disease, and famine were natural checks to population growth.

Answer 1

• They would have disagreed on the idea that war, poverty, disease, and famine were natural checks to population growth.

Step-by-step explanation:

Malthus believed that the populace would dependably expand more quickly than sustenance supply, which implied that substantial quantities of individuals would dependably experience the ill effects of starvation and poverty. His calculations exhibited that while nourishment supply developed at a straight rate, populaces would in general develop at an exponential one.

Karl Marx felt that populace development would cause things like absence of resources. In the interim, Adam Smith wanted more individuals to be born.

Answer 2

I think the answer to this question would be “They would have disagreed on the idea that war, poverty, disease, and famine were natural checks to population growth.”
This based upon that Karl Marx thought that population growth would cause things like lack of resources. Meanwhile, Adam smith wanted more people to be born.