Longer school days lead to a decrease in crime committed by teenagers, since students have less free time.
The counterclaim argues that having a longer day would take away the free time children have to spend time with their friends. The rebuttal for the counterclaim should show why the counterclaim is not a good argument. The first option supports the counterclaim rather than opposes it. Option 3 says nothing for or against either argument, staying neutral so it is not an effective rebuttal. Option 4 is similar to the first option in that it supports the counterclaim. Option B (Longer school days lead to a decrease in crime committed by teenagers, since students have less free time. ) is the only one that goes against the counterclaim. It shows why student have more free time is actually a bad thing.