154k views
3 votes
Is the given conjecture a valid rule for the following sequence? If not, give a counterexample. Sequence: 1, 2, 3, 6, 18, 108, ... Conjecture: Multiply the previous 2 terms to get the next term

2 Answers

6 votes
A counterexample is seen in the third term, 3, which does not equal 1*2=2.

1*2=2 NOT 3
User Vincent Barrault
by
5.7k points
1 vote
No; 3 is a counterexample. is what i got

User Ahanusa
by
6.1k points