Question

When a scientific investigation produces evidence that does not support the hypothesis, what can you conclude about the investigation? (2 points)

a) A law has been formed.

b) A theory remains accurate.

c) A theory has been disproved.

d) More investigations need to be completed.

pls help

Answer 1

D) More investigations need to be completed.

Step-by-step explanation:

When a scientific investigation produces evidence that does not support the hypothesis, you can conclude that:

"More investigations need to be completed."

Failure to support the hypothesis does not necessarily mean that a theory has been disproved or that a law has been formed. Instead, it indicates that further research and experimentation may be required to better understand the phenomenon or to refine the hypothesis. Science is an iterative process, and negative results are valuable in guiding future investigations and improving scientific understanding.

Hope this helps :))

Answer 2

The correct answer is option D, More investigations need to be completed

Step-by-step explanation:

When a scientific investigation produces evidence that does not support the hypothesis, some lacuna must have occurred in the research process. Therefore it is the duty of the researcher to look for the missed out things and lead the research in the right direction. The researcher may not be able to find the exact issue in the research, thus his first step would be to find the stage at which the fault has occurred and then rectify it. After that the researcher must do further detailed investigation to collect the evidence that support the hypothesis and thus complete the investigation.