195k views
3 votes
How do I solve this?

Rudy has been awarded some money in a settlement. He has the option to take a lump sum payment of $200,000 or get paid an annuity of $1,000 per month for the next 25 years. Which is the better deal for Rudy, and by how much, assuming the growth rate of the economy is 2.75% per year?

1)
Lump Sum: by $14,899.82


2)
Annuity: by $14,899.82


3)
Annuity: by $43,535.88


4)
Lump Sum: by $43,535.88

2 Answers

5 votes
Hi there

First find the present value of annuity ordinary THE formula is
PVAO= pmt [(1-(1+r)^(-n))÷(r)]
PMT 1000×12months=12000 per year
R interest rate 0.0275
N time 25 years
So
PVAO=12,000×((1−(1+0.0275)^(
−25))÷(0.0275))
=214,899.82

Now compare the result with the amount of the lump sum
214,899.82−200,000
=14,899.82

So the answer is
2) Annuity: by $14,899.82

Hope it helps
User Haltabush
by
7.8k points
3 votes

Answer:

2) Annuity: by $14,899.82

Explanation:

Given is -

Rudy has been awarded some money in a settlement.

He has the option to take a lump sum payment of $200,000

or get paid an annuity of $1,000 per month for the next 25 years.

Lets assume, that the growth rate of the economy is 2.75% per year

We will find how much the value becomes in annuity after 25 years.

p =
12000*12=12000

r = 0.0275

n = 25 years

Present value formula is =
p(1-(1+r)^(-n) )/(r)

Putting the values in formula, we get


12000(1-(1+0.0275)^(-25) )/(0.0275)

=>
12000(1-(1.0275)^(-25) )/(0.0275)

= $214900.36

Now the difference between annuity and lump sum =


214900.36-200000=14900.36

We can take this as, close to given option 2.

Therefore, option 2 is correct.

The better deal for Rudy is to get paid an annuity, as it will give him $14899.82 more in 25 years than the lump sum amount.

User HoelR
by
8.4k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories