142k views
4 votes
Which of these was an argument of the new jersey plan

it allowed slaves to have representation in congress
it provided too much power the states in war time
it gave the advantage states that had a higher number of people
it would provide equal repensentation for each state

2 Answers

2 votes

Final answer:

The New Jersey Plan argued for equal representation for each state in Congress, regardless of population size. It was designed to protect smaller states' interests against the potentially dominating influence of larger states.

Step-by-step explanation:

The argument from the New Jersey Plan which countered the Virginia Plan was that it would provide equal representation for each state, irrespective of its population size. The New Jersey Plan envisioned a continuation of the unicameral legislative structure from the Articles of Confederation, where each state wielded a single vote. This approach aimed to protect the interests of smaller states against the larger ones, preventing an imbalance in power where states with higher populations might dominate the national legislature.

User Dror Cohen
by
7.9k points
2 votes

Answer:

It would provide equal representation for each state.

Step-by-step explanation:

The New Jersey Plan was a proposal for the structure of the United States government. The plan was originally presented at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 by William Paterson. The plan was presented as an alternative to the Virginia Plan. Some delegates had complained that the Virginia Plan gave too much representation to populous states. Therefore, the New Jersey Plan proposed a one-vote-per-state representation, with only one legislative body.

User Skfd
by
8.0k points