Question

Help me please ( if u dont know don't answer it)

Two middle school students often wear clothing with slogans like “Vegan All Day, Every Day, “The Moo Moo is a No No,” and “Be Cool, Be Vegan.” The students believe that consuming any animal products, like meat and milk, is bad for health and bad for the environment. They began a campaign to convince all the students in the school to bring lunch from home instead of eating school lunch. Each day greater numbers of students brought their lunch to school and wore pro-vegan clothing. The school suspended the students who began the campaign against the school lunches. School officials said it was a disruption to the school, because food was wasted, and cafeteria workers had less to do. The students’ parents complained, saying their students have the right to express their ideas and opinions through their clothing and actions. They brought the case to court on the students’ behalf. The students’ parents lost the case in state district court and so appealed it to their state court of appeals. There they won the case, but the school board appealed the decision to their state-level supreme court. The state supreme court found in favor of the school board. The students and their parents are now appealing the state supreme court’s decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.


How is this case like the Tinker v. Des Moines case?

Answer 1

This is like the Tinker v. Des Moines case.

Step-by-step explanation:

Both students in this case were not allowed freedom of speech and the right to express their opinion. The schools also made an unfair decision to punish the students for expressing themselves. They then took it up to court and the students in both cases lost.

Answer 2

This case was like the Tinker V Des Moines case because it has kids expressing what they feel is right, as the kids did with peace in the Des Moines case. In this case though, the two kids want to make people eat less milk and meat to become vegan as supposed in the article. I hope I could help.