182k views
2 votes
Mr. angelou believes that movies and televised news reports should portray only justifiable acts of violence and should never focus on the physical injury and suffering caused by these acts. use your understanding of observational learning to indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with mr. angelou.

2 Answers

6 votes
a) Little Kona has no predominant methodology as her ideal procedure relies on upon what Big Brew picks. However Big Brew dependably makes more by picking "High Price". Subsequently "High Price" is the Big Brew's predominant methodology. Realizing that Big Brew dependably picks "High Price," its predominant procedure, Little Kona picks "Enter."
b) Big Brew can consume the market and make $7 (the most extreme sum) just if Little Kona does not enter, in which case it makes zero. Yet, Little Kona can make $2 by entering the market. So Little Kona will consent to not enter just on the off chance that it is paid at any rate $2.Big Brew will pay up to $4 as with this new arrangement (Doesn't Enter, High Price), it can make $4 more than from past Nash harmony arrangement
User Jeet Parekh
by
7.7k points
4 votes

I disagree with Mr. Angelou at all. In the first place, no act of violence is justifiable, all violence is a cowardly and evil act. Secondly, cases of violence should not be displayed anywhere. The media have a very strong influence on people, show how acts of violence have been done, can influence and teach viewers to do similar acts.

User Roganjosh
by
8.0k points