Question

Which type of narrator has full knowledge of all characters, rather than just one character

A.third person limited

B.third person omniscient

C.naïve first person

Answer 1

C doesn't necessarily make sense. ''naive'' means the lack of experience/innocent. I doubt that they'd have full knowledge of all characters. They'd most likely know more about them/narrate more about their feelings and be oblivious to the others.

A. Not quite. Third person limited is well... Limited. It doesn't necessarily cover all the bases of each and every characters' feelings or what they think. The other characters are merely presented in an external way, whilst the main character is mainly presented in internal, whereas we know more about him rather than the other characters, in which we only learn about them externally.

Omniscient means 'all knowing'. That's exactly what third person omniscient is. All knowing and knowledgeable of and to all of the characters feelings and such. Therefore B.

Answer 2

The correct answer is "B. third person omniscient".

Step-by-step explanation:

Ominiscience means to have all knowledge with no limits; that is why letter B is the correct answer. Although a narrative may have different narrators with different characteristics, for instance "Epitaph of a Small Winner: A Novel" by Brazillian writer Machado de Assis (1839-1908) in which the narrator is dead, an ominiscient narrator knows everything, and that means the one responsible for all explanations and descriptions, similarly to a God who states and mentors everything happening in the narrative.