171k views
5 votes
Which statement would most likely be made by an opponent of the Supreme Court's decision in Engel v. Vitale?

A. People should not have to restrict their free exercise of religion just because they happen to be in a school.
B. Public institutions need to avoid any involvement with religious activity, even if it seems minor or harmless.
C. Students who do not practice a religion need to feel comfortable in and supported by their public schools.
D. Religious activity in public schools is a dangerous violation of the separation of church and state.

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:

A: People should not have to restrict their free exercise of religion just because they happen to be in a school.

User Shtolik
by
6.0k points
7 votes
the statement that would most likely be made by an opponent of the Supreme Court's decision in Engel v. Vital is: A. People should not have to restrict their free exercise of religion just because they happen to be in a school.

The case ruled that forcing public school students to do a morning prayer is unconstitutional because it somehow violates one of the basic right of the constitution, the freedom of religion.
User Ethan Yanjia Li
by
5.7k points