3.3k views
1 vote
Saleem wants to create a table of ratios that are equivalent to 2/3. He includes the ratios 4/5 and 5/6.

Are these ratios equivalent to 2/3? Explain your reasoning,

2 Answers

7 votes

Final answer:

The ratios 4/5 and 5/6 are not equivalent to 2/3. Equivalency can be tested through cross-multiplication, and in both cases, the products do not match those of 2/3, indicating that the ratios are not equivalent.

Step-by-step explanation:

Saleem wants to determine if the ratios 4/5 and 5/6 are equivalent to 2/3. To be equivalent, two ratios must have the same value when simplified. To check equivalency, one can cross-multiply the ratios or simplify them for comparison.

For 4/5 to be equivalent to 2/3:

  • Cross Multiply: (4 × 3) must equal (5 × 2)
  • This would give us 12 = 10, which is not true.
  • Therefore, 4/5 is not equivalent to 2/3.

For 5/6 to be equivalent to 2/3:

  • Cross Multiply: (5 × 3) must equal (6 × 2)
  • This would give us 15 = 12, which is also not true.
  • Thus, 5/6 is also not equivalent to 2/3.

The ratios Saleem listed (4/5 and 5/6) are not equivalent to the ratio 2/3, as their cross products do not match the cross products of 2/3.

User Colin Hebert
by
8.3k points
3 votes
No....if you set them up as proportions and cross multiply the sides do not equal
User Hasentopf
by
8.0k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.