Question

What were the two opposing opinions during the Iconoclastic Controversy?

Some believed images of Christian figures should be allowed in paintings and sculptures, while others argued that sculptures should not be allowed because they took a human form.

Some believed the use of icons and their veneration was fine, and others felt that icons should not exist because it could lead to idolatry.

Some felt that only church members should be allowed to worship icons, but others felt that anyone should be allowed to worship icons.

Some wanted icons to be used only in religious places of worship, while others thought icons should also be used in other public places, as well as the home.

Answer 1

B).Some believed the use of icons and their veneration was fine, and others felt that icons should not exist because it could lead to idolatry.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

During the Iconoclastic Controversy, many thought that the use of icons is fine, but others felt that it wasn't fine and that it should be removed because it could lead to idolatry. Your answer would likely be B!

Have a nice day! :)