Question

Review the passage. “The Story Hour has been one of our most popular programs,” said Tomlinson. “Reading aloud helps bring literature to life for children, and I’m worried that without Story Hour, the kids will be getting more TV and less good literature.” Which best evaluates the use of this evidence to support the argument that library funding should not be cut because it provides important services to the community? This evidence does not support the argument because it addresses the Story Hour, rather than the library itself. This evidence does not support the argument because it relies on facts and statistics that are not related to the library cuts. The evidence supports the argument by making an emotional appeal to parents to encourage their children's reading habits once the library has closed. This evidence supports the argument by giving an example of a library service that has a positive impact upon specific residents of the community.

Answer 1

i think its reading aloud helps bring literate to life for children

hope this helps

Answer 2

This evidence supports the argument by giving an example of a library service that has a positive impact upon specific residents of the community.

Step-by-step explanation:

Ms.Tomlinson's section fills in as proof to the contention that library subsidizing ought not be cut since it gives the Bookmobile for instance of an administration that has had a constructive effect: the way that it enabled burdened individuals to approach a library.