Final answer:
Hilary Clinton balanced cultural respect with advocacy for human rights, exemplified by her criticism of women's treatment in countries like China and India. Her approach as a U.S. representative reflects the complexity of addressing global issues while respecting cultural equivalence.
Step-by-step explanation:
The concern appears to be about Hilary Clinton's positioning and statements on international women's rights. Being a public figure and a representative of the United States, Clinton has often had to address complex issues on a global stage. Her criticism of the treatment of women in countries like China and India at the international conference, despite her belief in cultural equivalence, can be seen as an instance where humanitarian concerns are raised above cultural relativism.
It's a common diplomatic balancing act to uphold human rights while also respecting the principle that no culture is superior to another. When grave issues such as mistreatment of women arise, it is generally accepted that addressing these concerns transcends cultural boundaries.
In the case of Hillary Clinton's health care reform efforts in 1993 and her later condemnation of women's treatment abroad, the apparent inconsistency lies in the difference between advocating for policy changes within one's own country and condemning human rights violations in others. It illustrates the complexity that national leaders face when navigating international advocacy and domestic policy.