204k views
3 votes
How did the decision in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke affect individual rights?

A. It limited rights by ending racial quotas in admissions decisions.


B.  It protected rights by allowing racial quotas in admissions decisions.
C.  It limited rights by allowing race to be an admissions decision factor.
D.  It protected rights by ending quotas but allowing race to be an admissions factor.
User Phi
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

5 votes

D. It protected rights by ending quotas but allowing race be an admissions factor.

In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court's decision gave some credence to Allan Bakke's claim that the University of California at Davis had practiced some amount of reverse discrimination in denying him admittance to the medical school because he was not an economically or educationally disadvantaged member of one of four racial/ethnic groups eligible for their special admission program. But the Court was careful to note that race could be considered as a factor (among many factors) in college admissions, with schools needing to practice great care in doing so. Having a basic quota system, such as UC Davis reserving 16 spots out of 100 each year, was considered discriminatory.

User Richt
by
7.6k points