215k views
5 votes
Students attending schools with mandatory uniform policies experience less pressure than do students who must choose their wardrobes. This is because school uniforms allow students and their parents to save money and time. The financial investment in uniforms at the beginning of the school year is far more economical than the purchase of an entire wardrobe of designer clothes and trendy styles. Students who do not have to deliberate what to wear each morning are able to invest their time in more productive ways, such as studying for tests or finishing homework. Uniforms may stifle students’ self-expression, but there are many other ways to reveal one’s individuality at school. Which sentence addresses a counterclaim

User Adam Grant
by
5.9k points

2 Answers

3 votes
Uniforms may stifle students' self-expression, but there are many other ways to reveal one's individuality at school.
User Rach Chen
by
6.7k points
4 votes

Answer: Uniforms may stifle students’ self-expression, but there are many other ways to reveal one’s individuality at school.

Step-by-step explanation: In the given text, we can see the explanation of an argument that explains why students should wear mandatory uniforms at school (it explains all the benefits, like the economy of the uniforms and that the students would have more time to spend in more productive ways than choosing what to wear). A counterclaim is a statement that refutes the main claim or argument, in the excerpt, the sentence that address a counterclaim is "Uniforms may stifle students’ self-expression, but there are many other ways to reveal one’s individuality at school."

User Kesselhaus
by
6.7k points