Question

HELP ASAP!!

Which of the following best explains the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore?

It decided that Florida’s first recount should resume in all disputed counties until completed and Bush was the winner.
It decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was unconstitutional and Bush was the winner.
It decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was appropriate according to the Constitution.
It decided that Florida’s first recount was against the Constitution and states cannot order recounts in any future election.

Answer 1

It decided that the Florida Supreme Court Decision to hold a new recount was unconstitutional and bush was the winner. This is because I got it right in the quiz.

Answer 2

I would say the second choice, It decided that Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was unconstitutional and Bush was the winner.

I say this because of what the decision was, "a divided Supreme Court ruled that the state of Florida's court-ordered manual recount of vote ballots in the 2000 presidential election was unconstitutional."

Hope this helps!