228k views
14 votes
Do you think you’d be happier as an only child or as one of many brothers and sisters? What are the pros and cons of both? Write a 7 sentence response.

please be real with this

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

I think I would be happier as an only child. But, I say that because it is hard to get as many things as among many brothers and sisters. For parents it always an issue if they get something for one child they need to get something for all of them. So, one pro is being able to get more things, another pro is not having to fight with anyone, and the last pro is not having to share anything or getting hand-downs. Cons are not having anyone to play with, another con is not having someone to talk to when you get in trouble, and the last con is not having someone else to help you with homework when your parents aren't home. But, overall I think it would be interesting to live without brothers and sisters. I am grateful for what I do have so not all is lost.

User Jonas Lomholdt
by
4.0k points
9 votes

Answer:

I personally think that having siblings is better than being an only child. A few pros of having siblings is entertainment. You will never be bored when you have siblings you can always force them to do something with you. A con is that they steal your food, the only way that you can keep your food safe is if you hide it and tell anyone that if they eat it that they will suffer. Another pro is that you can trick them into doing stuff for you, like if you don't want to a chore you can bribe siblings with literally anything and they will usally do it. Another con is that there are usally at least one fight per week. But all and all I would not trade my siblings for anything, but don't tell them that.

Hope this is good.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Ryan Plant
by
4.2k points