115k views
4 votes
HEEEELPP PLZZZZZ

Review the passage.
"I'm sad to see the bookmobile go," said Ms.Tomlinson, because it brings the library to people who find it hard to come to us." These people include disadvantage children and migrant workers on the city's west side, as well as many senior citizens in nursing homes.

Which BEST evaluates the use of this evidence to support the argument that library funding should not be cut because it provides important services to the community?
a.)this evidence does not support the argument because it relies on opinions,rather then facts and statistics, to make it's point

b.)This evidence does not support the argument because it addresses the bookmobile,rather then the library itself.

c.)This evidence supports the argument by giving an example of a library service that has a positive impact upon specific residents of the community.

d.)The evidence supports the argument by making an emotional appeal to improve the lives of disabled and handicapped citizens.

User SuhasD
by
7.7k points

2 Answers

7 votes

I believe the answer is:

c.)This evidence supports the argument by giving an example of a library service that has a positive impact upon specific residents of the community.

User Beakr
by
6.5k points
3 votes

The correct answer is option C: This evidence supports the argument by giving an example of a library service that has a positive impact upon specific residents of the community.

The Bookmobile service provides the opportunity to "reach a library" to a specific group of residents of the community: "disadvantaged children and migrant workers on the city's west side, as well as many senior citizens in nursing homes". This service has a positive impact on that group of people since it is a way in which they can have access to the library services.

User Pdbartlett
by
6.9k points