Final answer:
The governments of Syria, Mexico, and Brazil vary significantly, with Syria being an authoritarian regime, whereas Mexico and Brazil are democratic but face their own political challenges. All have engaged with globalization, yet their governance differs greatly in terms of freedom and political stability.
Step-by-step explanation:
The governments of Syria, Mexico, and Brazil can be analyzed through various aspects such as their leadership structures, political history, and levels of political freedom. Syria is essentially an authoritarian regime, with Bashar al-Assad's leadership criticized for its lack of political freedoms and human rights issues. In contrast, Mexico and Brazil are democracies, with their governments elected through a political process and changes in leadership through elections as opposed to the authoritarian continuity seen in Syria.
Furthermore, despite being democracies, both Mexico and Brazil have faced significant political challenges, including corruption and political turmoil, potentially impacting their economic development and political stability. The reference to semi-presidential and parliamentary regimes suggests that Brazil, with its presidential system, might differ from Syria's semi-presidential system, which is concentrated towards the lower end of the freedom scale. All three countries have experienced globalization, as indicated by economic transactions connecting them to the global market, but their political arrangements and state of governance remain distinct.