By "ck" I'm assuming you're referring to the series solution's coefficients, i.e.

.
Differentiating gives


Substituting into the ODE yields


By extracting the first term (

) of the third series, you can consolidate the second and third series:

Next, since the first series starts with a constant term while the other two start with a quadratic term, remove the first two terms:

Now shift the index so that the series begins at the same starting index by replacing

with

.

So now the series can be joined into one:
![\displaystyle\sum_(k\ge1)\bigg[(k+3)(k+2)c_(k+3)-kc_k+c_k\bigg]x^(k+1)](https://img.qammunity.org/2018/formulas/mathematics/college/37bds70f70lj25tvjm5i2vh4vl7lce5iqi.png)
which means the ODE is equivalent to
![\displaystyle\sum_(k\ge1)\bigg[(k+3)(k+2)c_(k+3)-(k-1)c_k\bigg]x^(k+1)+c_0x+2c_2+6c_3x=0](https://img.qammunity.org/2018/formulas/mathematics/college/xrmsaxyvwoa6oh1xnzge0mvtwg8ca36a5b.png)
It follows that

and

. Using this, you solve the recurrence

with the initial values

and

.
Because

, it follows that

; in general,

for all

.
Also, because the RHS of the recurrence vanishes when

, it follows that

; or generally,

for

, leaving you with only one not-necessarily-zero term of

.
So the hard part is finding a solution for

when

is a multiple of 3. By finding the first few of these terms, you'll start to notice a pattern. Starting with

, you find




and so on, following a general pattern of


valid for

.
So the series solution is







So the two solutions are

and

.
To solve the IVP, notice that when

, you have


so the solution to the IVP is the same as that to the general solution with the unknowns replaced accordingly.